| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
| 4. |  | PALLADINO, C.; PAREJA, L.; PEREYRA, S.; PÉREZ, C. Problems of pesticide residues in grains. [La problemática de los residuos de fitosanitarios en granos]. [Problemática dos resíduos de fitossanitários em grãos]. I Technical Conference of the Plant Protection Group - EEMAC. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2023, Vol.27 (Supplement), e1230. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.27.1230 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 24 Jul 2032; Accepted 25 Jul 2023; Published 11 Sep 2023. -- Editor: Horacio Silva, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Paysandú, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Cintia Palladino,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 6. | | PALLADINO, C.; PEREZ, G.; ALONSO, R.; BENTANCUR, O.; PEREZ, C.A. Enfermedades bacterianas en eucalipto: estado del conocimiento a nivel nacional. In: JORNADA TÉCNICA DE PROTECCIÓN FORESTAL, 6., 2013, TACUAREMBÓ, UY; BALMELLI, G.; SIMETO, S.; MARTINEZ, G.; GOMEZ, D. (Ed.). Montevideo, UY: INIA, 2014. 53-63 (INA Serie Técnica; 213)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 7. | | PALLADINO, C.; PÉREZ, C.A.; PAREJA, L.; PÉREZ-PARADA. A.; FRANCO, J.; PEREYRA, S. Fungicide strategies for Ramularia Leaf Spot control recommended in Uruguay and its residues in barley grains. [Estrategias de fungicidas recomendadas para el control de ramulariosis en Uruguay y sus residuos en granos de cebada.]. [Estratégias de fungicidas para o controlo da ramulariose recomendadas no Uruguai e respectivos resíduos nos grãos de cevada.]. Section. Plant protection. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2024, Vol.28, e1262. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.28.1262 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 04 October 2023; Accepted 01 December 2023; Published 01 February 2024. -- Editor: María Inés Siri, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Cintia Palladino, cpalladino@cup.edu.uy --...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 8. | | PÉREZ, C.; MARTÍNEZ, G.; SIMETO, S.; TORRES, D.; PALLADINO, C.; LANGONE, F.; BENTANCUR, O.; BALMELLI, G. Relevamiento sanitario en plantaciones jóvenes de eucalipto en el litoral oeste del país - Otoño 2012. ln: INIA TACUAREMBÓ. PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN PRODUCCIÓN FORESTAL. V Jornada de Protección Forestal, 14 y 15 de noviembre, Tacuarembó. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2012. p. 11 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 703)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 10. | | PALLADINO, C.; MUELA, A.; TABORDA, B.; PUIGVERT, F.; PÉREZ-PARADA, A.; COLAZZO, M.; PÉREZ, C. A.; PEREYRA, S.; PAREJA, L. Application of a straightforward Mmthodology by LC-QqQ-MS/MS and GC-MS to ensure food safety of barley and wheat grain. ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 371-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00263 Article history: Received 29 November 2021; Accepted 24 February 2022; Revised 4 February 2022; Published online 16 March 2022; Published in issue 18 April 2022.
Corresponding author: Pareja, L.; Departamento de Química Del Litoral,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 11. | | PÉREZ, C.A.; MARTÍNEZ, G.; SIMETO, S.; TORRES, D.; PALLADINO, C.; LANGONE, F.; BENTANCUR, O.; BALMELLI, G. Prospección sanitaria en plantaciones jóvenes de eucalipto primavera 2008-otoño 2012 In: BALMELLI, G.; SIMETO, S.; MARTÍNEZ, G.; GÓMEZ, D. (Eds.). V Jornada técnica de protección forestal. Avances de investigación en plagas y enfermedades forestales Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2013. p. 23-28 (INIA Serie Técnica; 209)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 12. | | PÉREZ, G.; BALMELLI, G.; SIMETO, S.; MARTÍNEZ, G.; TORRES, D.; GÓMEZ, D.; JORGE, C.; IBÁÑEZ, M.; MORALES, V.; PALLADINO, C.; RAMÍREZ, N.; PINTOS, M.; BASILE, P.; GASPARRI, M.; RASKIN, B.; BENTANCUR, O.; ALTIER, N.; ABREO, E.; PÉREZ, C. Grupo de investigación en protección forestal (GIPF), un compromiso con el manejo sustentable de los montes del Uruguay. ln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016. p. 34 Modalidad oral.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/09/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
RAEGAN HOEFLER; GONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.; MADHAV BHATTA; NUNES, J.A.R.; BERRO, I.; NALIN, R.S.; BORGES, A.; COVARRUBIAS, E.; DIAZ-GARCIA, L.; QUINCKE, M.; GUTIERREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
HOEFLER, R., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; PABLO GONZALEZ-BARRIOS, Dpartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; BHATTA, M., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; JOSE A. R. NUNES, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; INES BERRO, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA; RAFAEL S. NALIN, Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 131418-900, Brazil.; ALEJANDRA BORGES, Statistics Department, Facultad de Agronomía, Univesidad de la República, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EDUARDO COVARRUBIAS, CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform (EiB), El Batan, Mexico International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.; LUIS DIAZ-GARCIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, 20676, Aguascalientes, Mexico.; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCIA GUTIERREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA. |
|
Título : |
Do Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. |
|
Contenido : |
Controlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online. MenosControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; PREDICTION ACCURACY; RANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; RESPONSE TO SELECTION; SPATIAL CORRECTION. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO EXPERIMENTAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16700/1/JABES-2020.pdf
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03067naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1061304
005 2022-09-05
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2$2DOI
100 1 $aRAEGAN HOEFLER
245 $aDo Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
520 $aControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments. However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
653 $aAUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aPREDICTION ACCURACY
653 $aRANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
653 $aRESPONSE TO SELECTION
653 $aSPATIAL CORRECTION
700 1 $aGONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.
700 1 $aMADHAV BHATTA
700 1 $aNUNES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBERRO, I.
700 1 $aNALIN, R.S.
700 1 $aBORGES, A.
700 1 $aCOVARRUBIAS, E.
700 1 $aDIAZ-GARCIA, L.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
